|
21st
February
2008
 About a month ago I decided to try a new link building tool called Linkvana, and I wrote about it on my blog. Now, about 30 days later, I AM still impressed. I HAVE seen ranking improvements, spidering frequency HAS improved, and all can be traced directly related to our LinkVana use, in my opinion. Once again, I’ll repeat that this is NOT not a “total” solution, but it’s a DAMN good piece of pie for $149 a month. It’s like having a little vote out there, with proper link text back to the page of your choice. I’m STILL not impressed with the PR or quality of most of the blogs, but it’s WORKING. For slightly longer tail phrases, (three or more words), and for “less competitive” ones (even one and two words, but with LESS than 2 million competing results) it’s really helped more than I even thought it would. CAN Linkvana be abused, and used for evil? Sure, I guess so, but they’ll just kick you out, so why would you bother? After about 5 weeks, I’m happy, I’m keeping it, and frankly, I’m TOTALLY surprised that it’s not sold out. I think it’s just one of those poorly promoted new programs, and with only 300 members to fill total, none of the “email blast gurus” figure it’s worth promoting on an affiliate basis. Also, I’m finding that the 3 to 5 minutes per link to write the posts ourselves is tiresome, so I’m using the outsourcing they offer more and more too. At $2 apiece, it’s almost too easy, and all I have to do is choose the link text and landing pages I want. Finally, I’ll say AGAIN, that it is NOT a cure-all, that can be the one answer to your linking woes, but just like a couple of aspirin, it sure helps make the headache tolerable. And I;ll say again that this is NOT an automated black hat sort of thing. It’s up to YOU to intelligently disperse your incoming links with GOOD traffic phrases, that DO appear on the page you’re linking to, (or in the title tag ). That’s going to matter a LOT, and you’re going to kick some serious a** if done right, but it’s NOT going to be effective for link bombing unrelated pages. Got it? In my opinion, anyone that builds links for multiple sites can be VERY well served by spending just a little time in LinkVana daily, assuming they know what they’re doing, and spread the link love to their internal deeper pages. You might want to try it yourself, before it’s too late. |
|
|||||||||
|
|
| |||||||
Copyright 2007; Search Commander; SEO Consultant Scott Hendison; All Rights Reserved.
February 24th, 2008 at 9:57 am
I just tried this after watching your video on the other post. You’re telling us this actually works? You’ve seen rankings improve?
It way seems too easy to me - and it can’t be white hat. But, if it really does work… hmmmmm…. Think of the potential!
March 27th, 2008 at 4:01 pm
Scott, I appreciate all the info on LV. I have been a member for about 3 weeks and I am impressed with how fast the posts are being spidered and indexed on Google. Anyway, thanks for the encouragement I think I am going to stick it out. Do you think this is dependable enough to put SEO clients on the system and expect results?
March 28th, 2008 at 5:38 am
The comment J made above - “this can’t be white hat” - Well, I’d have to agree, it is too easy, and must be frowned upon by G - However, there’s no TOS violations going on in my opinion, and at worst, it’s “grey”. and Yes, I’ve seen rankings improve.
@Jason -
In my opinion it’s absolutely dependable enough to put clients or any other website into, although it REALLY can’t be the sole source for the link building.
Yes I’ve taken brand-new domains, and had them indexed by Google in under 72 hours using nothing but LV to get them discovered.
Yes a few weeks later the site is ranking for many phrases, receiving decent traffic, and it almost feels on the surface like I could do nothing else but regularly feed a few LV links.
HOEWVER, I know that this is a precarious perch to be sitting on, and building all my links from any single source, no matter how diverse the network claims to be, is not a smart thing.
It’s tempting to get carried away, but if all the LV members use it wisely, and not abusively, it will continue to improve.
So yes, for clients I’m using LV to supplement the link building process, but not to replace it entirely. For the deeper links and anchor text precision the two dollar posts can’t be beat.
Another downside to putting clients in the system would be the generally lower quality websites from which you are building these backlinks…
If the site you’re building for is a WordPress site, as so many are these days, then the client sees these backlinks showing up in the admin console, and wonders what the heck is going on!
I actually pointed them out to one client, and he was sort of sad, thinking he had real fans out there that were writing about him
- Pretty funny!
March 28th, 2008 at 5:59 am
That is funny, I am not using Link Vana with any wordpress sites but I will keep that in mind. How many links are you sending out a day for your sites? Does it vary on how long the site has been around?
March 28th, 2008 at 6:16 am
I chose to stick with their (new) minimum distribution, which is just 1-3 per day - I’ve not overdone it at all with LV, and kept most of my domains between 10 and 30 new LV links per month.
For a domain with lots of diverse inbound links already, I wouldn’t say age has much to do with it - although yes, a brand new site getting links daily is an oddity, and may raise a red flag….
March 28th, 2008 at 8:03 am
I have to say that I did a post for one of my keywords that has very little competition (around 100,000) in LV about one week ago. I just did a search for that keyword and the blog it was own held the number one spot in Google in less than a week! Very cool I think.
April 3rd, 2008 at 4:05 pm
Scott,
I was wondering if I should be concerned that none of the links from linkvana are showing up in Google’s webmaster tools under external links? They are showing up in yahoo’s site explorer though. I have seen some good jump in ranking though.
Also, I had a site that all the links were dumped in Google to 0. I think its because several months ago I thought I would see what happened if I put it on link trinity. An Automated 3-way scheme linking project. I removed the site after I saw that my site would be linking to some adult content within a week, however they never removed me from their network. I thought the worse that would happen would be that those links would not count, however all other links were dropped and I have completely fallen all the way off of Google. I am still indexed, just not in the top 1000 results (I was at 43 for my main targeted keyword). Should I scrap the site, change the IP and start over or just do the SEO the right way this time with the current site?
Are other sites that I own in danger of being penalized for that one bad site because they are on the same server?
April 5th, 2008 at 8:07 pm
Sorry for the delayed response, I was out of town for Elite Retreat.
Actually, I just spot checked a few, and 6 of 8 were in Google. If I were you, I’d report to their tech support though, and leave it up to them to explain.
I actually had a question sort of like this in the beginning with them about the text snippet surrounding my link in a few of the posts, that I couldn’t find in Google when I searched for it in quotes.
I assumed that meant the page was not in G’s index, but he actually pointed out that i was incorrect, and showed me how to tell.
Far more important than whether a particular link shows up or not, are rankings and visitor landings from those keyphrase searches improving?
re: the second question - if it were me, I would go into my Google Webmaster tools account and request a reinclusion, explain exactly what you did, why you did it, and cross your heart and hope to die that you never do it again.
if you’re sincere (sounding) that in my experience you should see a reinclusion although don’t expect an actual answer. I had a domain reappear mysteriously after about a week, yet the question is still remaining honey answered in Webmaster tools since November.
Finally, are other sites you own in danger? They’re not “supposed” to be, but there seems to be an awful lot of hand editing going on. I spent some quality time with some serious people this last week to tell me some stories I would not have thought could possibly be true.
Once you’ve been identified as pushing the envelope of their Webmaster guidelines, it all depends on the mood and attitude of the reviewing engineer, and it seems like anything is possible now.
April 7th, 2008 at 5:08 am
Scott, thanks for the advice. I hope you enjoyed the Elite Retreat. I went into my webmaster tools yesterday and found that 121 links had been given back to me and I had moved back up to 143, which is a 100 less than where I was before, but better than being banned. I am just curious how all this happened and if my site(s) will be under further scrutiny.
When you private register a domain, does that keep Google from knowing who owns it? I guess I will be switching my email address at Google, setting up a fake IP for my home and registering new domains at a different host. Sounds like alot of trouble too me though.
April 7th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
You’re welcome, and yes I did enjoy it, thanks
Theoretically, registering with privacy is SUPPOSED to keep your info private, but…
1. I don’t believe it
2. Having a mini-net or something with all private registrations is a flag in itself
3. Do like I do - Just don’t do anything that for any reason you may want to hide yourself for. - heh
April 8th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
Yes, I agree with you.
I had absolutely no clue to anything to do with SEO 8 months ago, I read someone’s blog and bought the pitch (I am sure that it was an affiliate) and purchased a linking scheme service. I inadvertently violated Google’s terms of service by purchasing links (I also joined a free version of the same type of site). I stopped the service not long after the purchase, however I was just concerned that those earlier blunders would hinder my current “white hat” SEO efforts. I am getting some results for other sites I am managing, I guess I should not jump the gun on being “blacklisted”.
April 16th, 2008 at 9:24 am
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the excellent post. I really need your advice on something. I have about 30 sites and a very healthy adsense account. I was making a very good monthly income, until about April 3rd, all of my sites suffered a huge Google penalty and dropped out of the 1st 10 pages of Google…
The weird thing is, each and every site within my adsense account has been penalized, even though they are NOT inter-linked, target completely different niches, and even reside on two separate hosts! Most of the domains are owned privately.
I will admit, some of the sites have spinned content but some of the sites don’t. Regardless, each and every site has suffered and I cannot understand why?
Any advice?
April 17th, 2008 at 8:28 am
Without knowing more, (not that I’m asking
it’s of course hard to say.
However, there’s talk of others that have seen drops in Adsense sites ranking too, as they try to improve the quality of the network.
Perhaps there’s something in Google Webmaster tools that would point to a clue? Are your stats showing crawls? New content added regularly? Have you tried the Adsense Google group?
April 17th, 2008 at 8:55 am
Faisal,
One thought about site association would be through your google account. If one site is banned for something Google considers a violation of TOS, they may have associated the other domains through adsense, analytics or webmaster tools.
April 17th, 2008 at 9:07 am
Dear Scott & Jason,
Thank you for your feedback. Currently, I’m not using Google Webmaster Tools (I know I should be).
Some of the sites have a blog that gets updated regularly, and some of the sites haven’t been updated in quite some time. Some sites have spinned content in the backend, while others don’t.
What’s strange is that all the sites in my adsense account have been penalized even though they are so diverse. The only thing in common is the 3-4 adsense blocks per page…
Moreover, my sites haven’t been completely penalized, some have fallen to the 5th or 6th page of Google so I don’t see it exactly as a TOS violation. Other sites, however, can’t be found.
I didn’t receive an email from Google or any other indication of what could be wrong.
Its just hard for me to accept that Google would indiscriminately “penalize” each and every site in my account without distinguishing one from another. Its just all very strange.
May 12th, 2008 at 8:56 am
Faisal,
Your sites may not be dropped out of the previous ranking positions just because they are Adsense sites. It’s likely to be other factors. Are they all or mostly getting links from the same or similar sources? If those links get dropped or devalued by Google, then it’s no wonder all your sites are affected at the same time.
My advise these days is already to play clean and safe with sites that monetize with Adsense. Too many people had been able to get away with it for far too long, but got caught by Google eventually. And they end up crying foul when their adsense income got wiped out completely when they should know better not to play with fire in the first place (I’m not implying you do).
I have even seen sites that comply with their rules closely got dropped from top rankings overnight. That’s why I would not depend on Adsense for my livelihood. It’s a good supplement of income but too risky to rely on it fully.