<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google changed on Wednesday?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/technology-articles/ready-for-google-to-change-on-wednesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/technology-articles/ready-for-google-to-change-on-wednesday/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/technology-articles/ready-for-google-to-change-on-wednesday/#comment-32019</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 03:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/archives/376#comment-32019</guid>
		<description>No, not bitter, just embarrassed!  How could I not have noticed? 

Anyway, it DID seem to cut down the number of available spots on page one, didn't it?

Google News seems to frequently take one of the spots, even when it's showing 10 organic results...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not bitter, just embarrassed!  How could I not have noticed? </p>
<p>Anyway, it DID seem to cut down the number of available spots on page one, didn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Google News seems to frequently take one of the spots, even when it&#8217;s showing 10 organic results&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff the Great</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/technology-articles/ready-for-google-to-change-on-wednesday/#comment-31934</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff the Great</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 02:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/archives/376#comment-31934</guid>
		<description>you seem bitter, no big deal, don't worry about it.

I am dissapointed though.  You only spent 2 minutes and 15 seconds on my blog....but you did view 2 pages.  Did you at least click an ad for me?

..and the difference between me mispelling ariel and you missing the whole google thing is that I'm not an english professor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you seem bitter, no big deal, don&#8217;t worry about it.</p>
<p>I am dissapointed though.  You only spent 2 minutes and 15 seconds on my blog&#8230;.but you did view 2 pages.  Did you at least click an ad for me?</p>
<p>..and the difference between me mispelling ariel and you missing the whole google thing is that I&#8217;m not an english professor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeoSidewalk &#187; Three Google News&#8230; More Than One Can Handle A Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/technology-articles/ready-for-google-to-change-on-wednesday/#comment-31919</link>
		<dc:creator>SeoSidewalk &#187; Three Google News&#8230; More Than One Can Handle A Day!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/archives/376#comment-31919</guid>
		<description>[...] The first one is actually an old news, where Google changed how they present their search results. I am sure everybody knows by now that they will be presenting the relevant information from videos, to news, to organic search, etc&#8230; At first, this seemed like an extraordinary benefit to the searchers&#8230; until I read an article by Scott Handison, where he points out that the most of the benefit is actually going to Google (again)! He is making a good argument that by providing various &#8220;relative search results&#8221; from different Google Properties, Google is indeed keeping the searchers within the Google domain where they can serve more advertising (His post &#8211;&#62; Google Changed on Wednesday?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The first one is actually an old news, where Google changed how they present their search results. I am sure everybody knows by now that they will be presenting the relevant information from videos, to news, to organic search, etc&#8230; At first, this seemed like an extraordinary benefit to the searchers&#8230; until I read an article by Scott Handison, where he points out that the most of the benefit is actually going to Google (again)! He is making a good argument that by providing various &#8220;relative search results&#8221; from different Google Properties, Google is indeed keeping the searchers within the Google domain where they can serve more advertising (His post &#8211;&gt; Google Changed on Wednesday?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/technology-articles/ready-for-google-to-change-on-wednesday/#comment-31874</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 05:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/archives/376#comment-31874</guid>
		<description>You've got me Jeff...

I've edited the post above to correct the date, and added an italicized note at the top. 

I'm embarrassed and humiliated, and you win this month's "Find my errors" contest. Although you've spelled "aerial" wrong on your post about the tram, my error was worse.  

I'll gladly buy you a beer, and I really do appreciate you pointing it out. I think you should link to this post everywhere to show people how oblivious I am.

And yes, I'm an Internet consultant, but apparently much too tired, and also unable to read a calendar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got me Jeff&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve edited the post above to correct the date, and added an italicized note at the top. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m embarrassed and humiliated, and you win this month&#8217;s &#8220;Find my errors&#8221; contest. Although you&#8217;ve spelled &#8220;aerial&#8221; wrong on your post about the tram, my error was worse.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll gladly buy you a beer, and I really do appreciate you pointing it out. I think you should link to this post everywhere to show people how oblivious I am.</p>
<p>And yes, I&#8217;m an Internet consultant, but apparently much too tired, and also unable to read a calendar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff the Great</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/technology-articles/ready-for-google-to-change-on-wednesday/#comment-31873</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff the Great</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 04:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/archives/376#comment-31873</guid>
		<description>A few problems with your post:

Today (Sunday) is the 20th

Wednesday is the 23rd

Google launched their new search last week.

So you are an internet consultant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few problems with your post:</p>
<p>Today (Sunday) is the 20th</p>
<p>Wednesday is the 23rd</p>
<p>Google launched their new search last week.</p>
<p>So you are an internet consultant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
