PubCon by Webmaster World - Speaker
Speaker bio

This blog is on the Big List of best search marketing blogs

2004 logo for Advanced Search Engine Workshops

 

Oregon Computer Consultants Association board member logo
Consultant page

  

Search Engine Marketing Alliance - PDX

  

Independent Computer Consultants Association logo

consultant page

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

2005 logo for Advanced Search Engine Workshops

 

  

Paying for email sent

9th February 2006

You might have heard on the news that AOL and MSN are considering charging businesses for each email they send. Well that’s simply not true, and Here’s the full details of what’s going to be happenning…

Basically it says that they may soon be charging senders for DELIVERY to their addresses. sort of like an e-stamp, to insure the mail gets past their spam filters.

That’s fine - however, there’s quite an uproar over the misconception that we’ll be charged to send email, and the reaction seems to be very negative, which surprises me. Personally, I would LOVE to see a pay to send model, perhaps even as a tax. (Yes, I said that)

What would be the ramifications to you if your ISP started charging you “per email sent” ? Would you go broke?

For my own business purposes, I’d say I send about 40 emails a day. Multiply that by 30 days (yes, I work 7 days a week) and that’s about 1200 emails a month.

The figure I’ve heard bantered about is everywhare from 1 cent to 1/100th of a cent per email, which would barely affect me. Even at a full penny per email, it would only be $12 a month.

Sure there’s whining that legitimate email marketers will be impacted, but still only minimally. They’ve been gettign a free ride long enough.

If the cost of a direct mail piece is 39 cents now, but an email cost a penny, there’s still a huge advantage to using email. To mail 2000 emails would only be $20. To mail 20,000 pieces would cost $200.

Think of the effect this would have on spammers, who send tens of millions of emails a day or more. They send all the mail they want, because it’s completely free. If a tiny mandatory charge were placed on email sent, this could effectively put spammers out of business.

If this was enforcable, I think it would be the perfect way to decrease spam, and increase revenue for much needed wireless broadband internet infrastructure in the United States. The reality though, is that spammers would continue to use offshore unregulated servers, and other computers and servers here that they hijack to send their garbage.

I’m not sure what the final answer is, but I do know that since November 2005, the amount of spam on the internet has tripled, and there are no signs of it slowing down. There’s got to be a way to stop it without putting the burden on us, the innocent emailbox owners.

Until then though, there’s always SpamArrest.


Please leave a comment, or use one of these networks for sharing...

  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting

 Recent Posts

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
AddThis Feed Button

Recommended Affiliate Partners

Compete Search Analytics

SEOmoz.org - Learn From SEO Experts. Become an Expert.

Free SEO Tools from Aaron Wall give you a competitive advantage. Aaron wrote the worlds best SEO book, and reading that helped me get my start in search.

Best of the Web is the oldest internet directory, and guaranteed to bring you bang for your buck. It's affordable and it's highly recommended by me, Scott Hendison! I'm a paid member for life...

Park Those Unused Domains and earn some cash, instead of having them just lie around doing nothing!



 
 

Copyright 2007; Search Commander; SEO Consultant Scott Hendison; All Rights Reserved.