Did your sites get more traffic,earn more money, or was it a bust?

Thanks.

Neurolinker, huh? It looks interesting, although, the fact that you have to put code on your site, and it posts links on your site automatically, would make it a bit riskier… looks interesting though!

Thanks for the review. Right now I’m with a cheaper service called Neurolinker, which is only 19.95. However, the pages that you get links from have 100s of links and your site also has to give away 100s of links in exchange for those. However they say these are one way links….I never bothered to check if it is true. I recently read an article and realized that should I one day decide to quit using their service, or should they decide to quit providing service, what will happen to my links? I asked them this question and the answer was that I will lose all those links should I decide to unsubscribe one day.
Do you know what happens in the case of LinkVana, if and when you decide to unsubcribe?
Say you’re going to be with them for 100 days, and you’ve gotten 300 links altogether during those 100 days to each site of yours and for some reason you had to unsubscribe from them? If these links are not permenant, and then suddenly these 300 links are taken away from your site, I don’t think that’s going to be a pretty picture with Google.
What’s your take on this? Please let me know. Thanks and if I buy linkvana, I’ll be sure to use your link

1. When you submit an article to a bunch of directories, that content in many cases is duplicated and ignored by the search engines.

2. Individual link text can point to individual landing pages, whereas in an author biography it tends to remain consistent from site to site.

3. Each linkvana post is unique, pointed to the landing page you wish, with the anchor text you wish, and surrounded by relevant text both before and after the link (assuming you do it correctly).

This is certainly not something you can do with the article directories, (but if you know of directories that allow this please tell me!).

4.Typical blogs display recent entries on their front page, so new posts will get exposure on a page with PR, typically for a least a couple of weeks.

5. The value of article directory marketing has been diminished greatly over the past 18 months or so, but I do personally still use it as a link building tactic. However, most experts agree that you need to diversify your inbound Link profile and that building links from any one place alone is foolish. Linkvana is just another tool, (although a very effective one).

Now, what I was wondering is, what is the difference between submitting an article to hundreds over article directories and Linkvana? I mean, it’s the same isn’t it in term of links. If an article get posted to a blog, it will be on a new page with no PR. If an article is posted on an article directory, it will also be on a page with no PR. Link strength would be the same but at least on the article directory side, we have ezinearticles, which has a strong PR6 main page. I doubt LV has any domain with this kind of authority. As for submitting to a few hundred directories, you can always pay someone to do it and it’s a lot cheaper than LV. Was just wondering, maybe I’m wrong.

They even specify no Markov (spun) content, no duplicate content etc. and if their network is as good as they say, it could really be something

It seems like it would be great if someone actually had the time to put 600 unique articles with the anchor text of your choice in each and every month, while the biggest appeal to me in Link-Vana is the outsourcing.

You can’t rely on any one service, and this is just another tool in the arsenal. It would be nice if there was one place to go, but diversity is the key to good link building.

So far, I’ve been real satisfied with what I’ve seen, and the results prove themselves month after month It’s also especially good for quickly getting new sites indexed.

Thanks again for commenting!