<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"  xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ways To Improve Google&#8217;s Webmaster Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/ways-to-improve-googles-webmaster-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/ways-to-improve-googles-webmaster-tools/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:16:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/ways-to-improve-googles-webmaster-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-34679</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/archives/375#comment-34679</guid>
		<description>Garry - 

I&#039;m here at SMX Seattle, and just talked with Matt Cutts personally about this. 

I  specifically mentioned  the whole &quot;piderman&quot; example post etc. and he assured me 100% that...

1. &quot;no follow&quot; passes no PR
2. &quot;no follow&#039; passes no anchor text weight.
3. It&#039;s still 100% &quot;okay&quot;, &quot;white hat&quot; etc. to nofollow whatever you like, for whatever reason you like, including funneling page rank.


The piderman example and another one he mentioned about a &quot;Texas used car&quot; thing, was a temporary glitch in the algo, that was repaired</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garry &#8211; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m here at SMX Seattle, and just talked with Matt Cutts personally about this. </p>
<p>I  specifically mentioned  the whole &#8220;piderman&#8221; example post etc. and he assured me 100% that&#8230;</p>
<p>1. &#8220;no follow&#8221; passes no PR<br />
2. &#8220;no follow&#8217; passes no anchor text weight.<br />
3. It&#8217;s still 100% &#8220;okay&#8221;, &#8220;white hat&#8221; etc. to nofollow whatever you like, for whatever reason you like, including funneling page rank.</p>
<p>The piderman example and another one he mentioned about a &#8220;Texas used car&#8221; thing, was a temporary glitch in the algo, that was repaired</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garry</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/ways-to-improve-googles-webmaster-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-32899</link>
		<dc:creator>garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/archives/375#comment-32899</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott
Thanks for your blog.  It&#039;s great advice.
I read it a lot.

I would like you to ask about &#039;nofollow&#039;.

I have found that having outbound links, followed or now, improves my SERP.  

I follow all links.  Is it REALLY true about the PageRank algorithm not giving weight to &#039;nofollow&#039; links?

Thanks
Garry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott<br />
Thanks for your blog.  It&#8217;s great advice.<br />
I read it a lot.</p>
<p>I would like you to ask about &#8216;nofollow&#8217;.</p>
<p>I have found that having outbound links, followed or now, improves my SERP.  </p>
<p>I follow all links.  Is it REALLY true about the PageRank algorithm not giving weight to &#8216;nofollow&#8217; links?</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Garry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
