<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tabbed Search Results at Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/tabbed-search-results-at-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/tabbed-search-results-at-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Article Checker</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/tabbed-search-results-at-google/comment-page-1/#comment-53479</link>
		<dc:creator>Article Checker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/?p=1497#comment-53479</guid>
		<description>Googz seems to be throwing in some new features with almost no publicity, too.  The SERP URL&#039;s are now formatted to show a more intuitive URL rather than a full URL.   Almost like bookmarks.  This, with Google Caffeine makes BING have to stay on their toes bigtime if they want to compete.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://searchenginereports.net/articlecheck.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Plagiarism Checker&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googz seems to be throwing in some new features with almost no publicity, too.  The SERP URL&#8217;s are now formatted to show a more intuitive URL rather than a full URL.   Almost like bookmarks.  This, with Google Caffeine makes BING have to stay on their toes bigtime if they want to compete.</p>
<p><a href="http://searchenginereports.net/articlecheck.aspx" target="_blank" >Plagiarism Checker</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/tabbed-search-results-at-google/comment-page-1/#comment-53268</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/?p=1497#comment-53268</guid>
		<description>Good points. It&#039;ll be interesting to see those tabbed results again someday long enough to look.

Over the holiday weekend I even played around with the diff Google datacenter results &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seochat.com/seo-tools/multiple-datacenter-google-search/&quot;target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; just to see if I could recreate it, and I couldn&#039;t.  Oh well, plenty else to do ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see those tabbed results again someday long enough to look.</p>
<p>Over the holiday weekend I even played around with the diff Google datacenter results <a href="http://www.seochat.com/seo-tools/multiple-datacenter-google-search/"target="_blank" target="_blank" >here</a> just to see if I could recreate it, and I couldn&#8217;t.  Oh well, plenty else to do <img src='http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/tabbed-search-results-at-google/comment-page-1/#comment-53267</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/?p=1497#comment-53267</guid>
		<description>@Scott yes i try not to fan the tinfoil hat theories too much.

But if you are looking for conspiratorial theories, speak with @Iman from TrainSignal you might be able to get some more data from their Google Analytics account. 

If you are looking for sinster plans I would suggest tracking how these keywords work atm....

Points to check on how the keywords shown in the &quot;tabs&quot; on the quality of the traffic.

How do the &quot;tab&quot; keywords convert
What is the bounce rate of the &quot;tab&quot; keywords
What is the time on site of &quot;tab&quot; keywords
What is the number of pages viewed of &quot;tab&#039; keywords</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott yes i try not to fan the tinfoil hat theories too much.</p>
<p>But if you are looking for conspiratorial theories, speak with @Iman from TrainSignal you might be able to get some more data from their Google Analytics account. </p>
<p>If you are looking for sinster plans I would suggest tracking how these keywords work atm&#8230;.</p>
<p>Points to check on how the keywords shown in the &#8220;tabs&#8221; on the quality of the traffic.</p>
<p>How do the &#8220;tab&#8221; keywords convert<br />
What is the bounce rate of the &#8220;tab&#8221; keywords<br />
What is the time on site of &#8220;tab&#8221; keywords<br />
What is the number of pages viewed of &#8220;tab&#8217; keywords</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/tabbed-search-results-at-google/comment-page-1/#comment-53266</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/?p=1497#comment-53266</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good theory David, and far less conspiratorial than mine ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good theory David, and far less conspiratorial than mine <img src='http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/tabbed-search-results-at-google/comment-page-1/#comment-53260</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/?p=1497#comment-53260</guid>
		<description>Ah great spot, but do we really need a new method we need to learn to optimise for?

The tabs seem a more dynamic way of displaying multiple pages so I assume the same 92-98% of clicks will goto the first tab!

The only real thoughts I have on the issue on how they are formed is that Google is finally using the data from search refinements.  So these might be some of the secondary queries that people search for after the primary phrase doesn&#039;t get them the results they expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah great spot, but do we really need a new method we need to learn to optimise for?</p>
<p>The tabs seem a more dynamic way of displaying multiple pages so I assume the same 92-98% of clicks will goto the first tab!</p>
<p>The only real thoughts I have on the issue on how they are formed is that Google is finally using the data from search refinements.  So these might be some of the secondary queries that people search for after the primary phrase doesn&#8217;t get them the results they expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/tabbed-search-results-at-google/feed/ ) in 1.41135 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:05 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 8:58 am UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/google/tabbed-search-results-at-google/feed/ ) in 0.00026 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:24 am UTC. -->
